<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Urbach &#38; Avraham, CPAs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uandacpas.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uandacpas.com</link>
	<description>NJ CPA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:31:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>US Estate Tax: When Filing is Optional but Advisable</title>
		<link>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/06/us-estate-tax-when-filing-is-optional-but-advisable/</link>
		<comments>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/06/us-estate-tax-when-filing-is-optional-but-advisable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BUSINESS FORUM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESTATE, TRUST, GUARDIANSHIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decease Spousal Unused Exclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSUE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Estate Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uandacpas.com/?p=1641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Completing a US Form 706 (US Gross Estate Tax Return) allows a decedent who is married and does not fully use his $5,250,000 exemption, to pass his unused exemption (“Decease Spousal Unused Exclusion or DSUE”) to his spouse. This is known as portability.

]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your beloved spouse has passed away.  The last thing you need is extra paperwork.  But…sometimes completing an extra form can mean the difference in literally millions – $5.25 million to be exact – able to be passed  free of federal estate taxes upon your death to your loved ones.</p>
<p>Completing a US Form 706 (US Gross Estate Tax Return) allows a decedent who is married and does not fully use his $5,250,000 exemption, to pass his unused exemption (“Decease Spousal Unused Exclusion or DSUE”) to his spouse. This is known as portability.</p>
<p>What does this mean in practical terms?</p>
<p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/06/us-estate-tax-when-filing-is-optional-but-advisable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hurricane Sandy Repairs Subject to NJ Sales Tax?</title>
		<link>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/06/hurricane-sandy-repairs-subject-to-nj-sales-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/06/hurricane-sandy-repairs-subject-to-nj-sales-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BUSINESS FORUM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX TIPS FOR INDIVIDUALS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales & Use Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uandacpas.com/?p=1634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Hurricane Sandy hit, the NJ Division of Taxation was flooded (no pun intended) with inquiries regarding the taxability of repairs. As a result, a helpful “Sales and Use Tax – Frequently Asked Questions” page has been added to its website. This article has the answers, including whether charges for demolition services or tree removal are subject to tax. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Hurricane Sandy hit, the NJ Division of Taxation was flooded (no pun intended) with inquiries regarding the taxability of repairs. As a result, a helpful “Sales and Use Tax – Frequently Asked Questions” page has been added to its website. This article has the answers, including whether charges for demolition services or tree removal are subject to NJ Sales Tax. To view the article, click here: <a title="NJ Division of Taxation" href="http://www.state.nj.us/treasury/taxation/sales_use_tax_FAQ.shtml">NJ Division of Taxation FAQ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/06/hurricane-sandy-repairs-subject-to-nj-sales-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take Advantage of our Updated Executor Checklist</title>
		<link>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/06/take-advantage-of-our-updated-executor-checklist/</link>
		<comments>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/06/take-advantage-of-our-updated-executor-checklist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estate Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESTATE, TRUST, GUARDIANSHIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LITIGATION SUPPORT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX TIPS FOR INDIVIDUALS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executor checklist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uandacpas.com/?p=1628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Urbach &#038; Avraham, CPAs, is proud to offer an executor checklist to help alleviate the nightmare of financial affairs of a deceased relative. This comprehensive list is regularly updated to reflect the latest changes in estate tax regulation. It will help you ensure compliance with tax requirements,take advantage of tax saving opportunities,preserve the assets of the estate, and clarify the tax ramifications of distributions.


]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urbach &amp; Avraham, CPAs, is proud to offer an executor checklist to help alleviate the nightmare of financial affairs of a deceased relative. This comprehensive list, which is regularly updated to reflect the latest changes in estate tax regulation, will help you:</p>
<ul>
<li>Ensure compliance with tax requirements</li>
<li>Take advantage of tax saving opportunities</li>
<li>Preserve the assets of the estate</li>
<li>Clarify the tax ramifications of distributions</li>
<li>To view the checklist, click here: <a title="Executor To-Do List" href="http://uandacpas.com/estate-and-trusts/to-do-list-for-executor/" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Executor To-Do List</span></a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/06/take-advantage-of-our-updated-executor-checklist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Life Insurance Proceeds: Name your Heirs or the Government Shares!</title>
		<link>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/06/life-insurance-proceeds-nj-inheritance-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/06/life-insurance-proceeds-nj-inheritance-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 22:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estate Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESTATE, TRUST, GUARDIANSHIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wills- Probate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ Inheritance Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uandacpas.com/?p=1618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many people assume life insurance proceeds, regardless of who the beneficiary is, are exempt from NJ Inheritance tax.  Therefore, even if they are leaving their estate to a beneficiary who is not a spouse or child, they see no need to choose a beneficiary.   However, life insurance left to an estate where the ultimate beneficiary is not a spouse or child is only exempt from NJ Inheritance tax if the beneficiary is actually named.  As NJ Inheritance taxes can be as high as 16% it is prudent to take the simple step of naming a beneficiary to avoid the NJ Inheritance Tax. 

]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have a life insurance policy without a specified beneficiary (other than your estate)?  Are you leaving your estate (residuary estate) to individuals other than a spouse or child?</p>
<p>Many people assume life insurance proceeds, regardless of who the beneficiary is, are exempt from NJ Inheritance tax.  Therefore, even if they are leaving their estate to a beneficiary who is not a spouse or child, they see no need to designate a beneficiary for the life insurance policy.  However, life insurance left to an estate where the ultimate beneficiary is not a spouse or child is not exempt from NJ Inheritance tax.  As NJ Inheritance taxes can be as high as 16%,  it is prudent to take the simple step of naming a beneficiary to avoid the NJ Inheritance Tax. </p>
<p>Unfortunately life insurance policies owned by individuals are includable for NJ Estate tax purposes, regardless of who is named as the beneficiary, if the assets of the estate are at least $675,000 (not an uncommon scenario for an insured decedent).  However, unless you cherish Chris Christie more than your loved ones, you can at least avoid paying NJ Inheritance taxes by simply naming an individual as beneficiary on your life insurance policy.     </p>
<p>Let’s illustrate:                                                              </p>
<p>Example #1: Uncle Harry dies and names his nephew in his will as sole heir of his entire estate. His only asset is a $500,000 life insurance policy. Since his estate is less than $675,000 there is no US or NJ Estate tax. If he named his nephew as beneficiary of his life insurance policy, there is no NJ Inheritance tax as well. However, if there is no named beneficiary (the estate is the beneficiary), the $500,000 is subject to a 15% inheritance tax, or $75,000.</p>
<p>Example #2: Same as above, except the policy is $1,000,000. NJ law states that the estate calculates the estate tax and the inheritance tax and pays the greater of the two, not both. The NJ Estate tax on $1,000,000 is $33,000. If Uncle Harry named his nephew as beneficiary, the inheritance tax is zero and the estate pays $33,200. If Uncle Harry did not name his nephew as beneficiary, the inheritance tax is 15-16% of $1,000,000 or $153,000. The Estate pays $153,000. The cost of not naming a beneficiary is $119,800 ($153,000 less $33,200).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/06/life-insurance-proceeds-nj-inheritance-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeff Urbach Appointed to Board of Directors of IACVA</title>
		<link>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/jeff-urbach-appointed-to-board-of-directors-of-iacva/</link>
		<comments>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/jeff-urbach-appointed-to-board-of-directors-of-iacva/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 22:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Valuations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LITIGATION SUPPORT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uandacpas.com/?p=1603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeffrey D. Urbach was recently appointed to the Board of Directors of the International Association of Consultants, Valuators, and Analysts, IACVA ( www.iacva.org ). IACVA will be hosting a welcome booth as part of the annual NACVA Conference in Washington in June.  IACVA is offering an all-day training for its members from China. Jeff will be speaking on the topic of preparing valuation reports for Court use to a special delegation from China of over 30 financial experts, most of whom, like Jeff, hold advanced credentials such as the CVA.

]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffrey D. Urbach was recently appointed to the Board of Directors of the International Association of Consultants, Valuators, and Analysts, IACVA ( <a href="http://www.iacva.org/">www.iacva.org</a> ). IACVA will be hosting a welcome booth as part of the annual NACVA Conference in Washington in June.  IACVA is offering an all-day training for its members from China. Jeff will be speaking on the topic of preparing valuation reports for Court use to a special delegation from China of over 30 financial experts, most of whom, like Jeff, hold advanced credentials such as the CVA.</p>
<p>Jeff, a Certified Valuation Analyst, specializes in several areas including business valuation, gifting/retirement planning, and healthcare practices (financial management, benchmarking, and valuation of practice).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/jeff-urbach-appointed-to-board-of-directors-of-iacva/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attention NJ Employers: 2013 FLINT Deadline is June 23rd</title>
		<link>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/nj-employers-2013-flint-deadline-is-june-23rd/</link>
		<comments>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/nj-employers-2013-flint-deadline-is-june-23rd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 21:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BUSINESS FORUM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STAFFING AGENCIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deadline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Loan Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ FLINT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uandacpas.com/?p=1605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the Flint assessment? The NJ DOL borrowed money from the federal government to pay Unemployment Insurance Benefits. NJ law requires the government to pass on the interest costs of the loan to NJ employers. Is this something new? It’s comparatively new. This is the third year of the assessment. How much is it? [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What is the Flint assessment?</strong></p>
<p>The NJ DOL borrowed money from the federal government to pay Unemployment Insurance Benefits. NJ law requires the government to pass on the interest costs of the loan to NJ employers.</p>
<p><strong>Is this something new?</strong></p>
<p>It’s comparatively new. This is the third year of the assessment.</p>
<p><strong>How much is it?</strong></p>
<p>The assessment is 0.73% of employer unemployment contributions made for 2012. The minimum assessment is $5. You should have received a bill in the mail recently. However, if you thought it was junk mail or moved and did not inform the state of your new address you might not have received it. <strong>It’s due June 23</strong>, after which it will accrue a 15% interest penalty, and you won’t know about it until NJ sends you a delinquency notice. Ouch!<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>How do I pay it?</strong></p>
<p>Payment options include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Check or money order payable to: NJDOLWD</li>
<li>EFT</li>
<li>E-check</li>
<li>Credit Card</li>
</ul>
<p>To make a payment online, click here: <a href="https://www1.state.nj.us/TYTR_BusinessFilings/jsp/common/Login.jsp?taxcode=45">NJ Division of Revenue On-Line Filing Service</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/nj-employers-2013-flint-deadline-is-june-23rd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should I Pay My Spouse a Salary?</title>
		<link>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/should-i-pay-my-spouse-a-salary/</link>
		<comments>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/should-i-pay-my-spouse-a-salary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 20:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BUSINESS FORUM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEDICAL PRACTICES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STAFFING AGENCIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX TIPS FOR INDIVIDUALS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Tip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uandacpas.com/?p=1595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s not uncommon for one’s spouse to work in the family business, whether as office manager or in some other capacity. Let’s assume that Dr. Sally Surgeon owns a medical practice. Her husband, Josh, is in charge of all IT operations and billing. Is it worthwhile for both spouses to receive a salary? At first [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s not uncommon for one’s spouse to work in the family business, whether as office manager or in some other capacity. Let’s assume that Dr. Sally Surgeon owns a medical practice. Her husband, Josh, is in charge of all IT operations and billing. Is it worthwhile for both spouses to receive a salary? At first glance, it may seem pointless. After all, their money ends up in the same bank account anyway. If Dr. Sally has already reached the maximum Social Security and SUI thresholds, why pay Josh a salary and incur additional steep payroll taxes? While that is true, there are several advantages to employing the spouse that are worth considering:</p>
<p><strong>Social Security Disability Benefits</strong>– were Josh to become permanently disabled, he would not receive Social Security benefits for his disability unless he satisfied two different earnings tests.  He must meet a “recent work” test based on his age at time of disability. For example at age 31 or more, an individual has to work five years out of the ten years prior to claiming disability. He must also satisfy a “duration of work” test based on his age at disability. For example, at age 50, he needs to have worked 7 years in total prior to his disability. <span id="more-1595"></span></p>
<p><strong>Lost Wages</strong> – If Josh was injured by an insured party, unless he can produce proof of a history of employment he won’t be able to recover any lost wages. </p>
<p><strong>Medical Insurance Deduction</strong>- If Dr. Sally’ s business income is reported on Schedule C, she is deducting the medical insurance expense for her and her family on page 1 of Form 1040. However if Josh is an employee, than he can be the insured. She can now deduct the medical insurance as a business expense on Schedule C.  This would result in significant tax savings, as she is now saving the 3.8% Medicare portion of the self-employment tax. Not a bad deal for an expense you’re incurring anyway.</p>
<p><strong>Credit Rating</strong>- Even if Dr. Sally is the breadwinner now, there may come a time that Josh will need to rely on his own credit history. If he is paid a salary it will be much easier for him to obtain the credit he will need.</p>
<p><strong>Social Security Benefits</strong>- The amount of Social Security benefits one receives is determined by the average of the 35 highest yearly salaries. Even if Josh’s earning power appears meager at the moment, you never know what the future holds. If he gets a more lucrative job eventually, the years he received a salary from Sally’s firm may ultimately significantly boost his benefits.</p>
<p><strong>Pension Benefits</strong>- As an employee, Josh can be enrolled in the company pension plan. This allows the company to make contributions on his behalf. By adding Josh’s pension contribution to Sally’s, the couple will enjoy increased tax free growth on their retirement funds, while the couple will  currently save on both US and NJ income taxes. This is particularly important when you consider the <a href="http://uandacpas.com/blog/2012/12/new-years-gift-from-the-irs-2013-tax-increases/">increased 2013 tax rates</a>, which can be as high as 50% federal and state combined! (The highest federal tax rate is 39.6%, which can increase to over 40% when phase outs are factored in).</p>
<p><strong>Dependent Care Credit</strong>- Unless both spouses have earned income they are not entitled to the dependent care credit, which is currently up to $1,200 for families with two children or more.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/should-i-pay-my-spouse-a-salary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Miss the Upcoming Constant Contact Seminar at U&amp;A</title>
		<link>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/constant-contact-seminar-at-ua/</link>
		<comments>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/constant-contact-seminar-at-ua/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BUSINESS FORUM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEDICAL PRACTICES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STAFFING AGENCIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constant Contact Free Seminar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Seminars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uandacpas.com/?p=1588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, June 4, 2013, Urbach &#038; Avraham will be hosting a fascinating and informative presentation by Bonnie Kantor, a Constant Contact Authorized Local Expert. She will be presenting a guided demonstration on the tools and features of Constant Contact’s email marketing system. This event is part of an ongoing series of seminars by Urbach &#038; Avraham, CPAs, to help businesses increase their revenue through marketing and finance management.  The event is free, but space is limited. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Join us on Tuesday, June 4, 2013, for a fascinating and informative presentation by Bonnie Kantor, a Constant Contact Authorized Local Expert. She will be presenting a guided demonstration on the tools and features of Constant Contact’s email marketing system. This event is part of an ongoing series of seminars by Urbach &amp; Avraham, CPAs, to help businesses increase their revenue through marketing and finance management.  The event is free, but space is limited. To register, call Pamela Avraham at 732-777-1158 or e-mail <a href="mailto:pma@ua-cpas.com">pma@ua-cpas.com</a>. To view the flyer with details  click here: <a href="http://uandacpas.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/UA-event-June-2013.pdf">Constant Contact Flyer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/constant-contact-seminar-at-ua/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Improved Lifestyle After Your Breakup? It Could Cost You in Alimony</title>
		<link>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/improved-lifestyle-could-cost-you-in-alimony/</link>
		<comments>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/improved-lifestyle-could-cost-you-in-alimony/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Dispute Resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIVORCE FORUM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uandacpas.com/?p=1578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to the modification or termination of alimony as a result of cohabitation, financial assistance received from the new cohabiter is not the only factor taken into consideration. The New Jersey Appellate Court recently upheld its ruling that indirect economic benefits may be considered as well, in Reese v. Weis.

]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to the modification or termination of alimony as a result of cohabitation, financial assistance received from the new cohabiter is not the only factor taken into consideration. The New Jersey Appellate Court recently upheld its ruling that indirect economic benefits may be considered as well.</p>
<p>In Reese v. Weis, Defendant Rebecca Weis was receiving $100k annually in alimony from her ex-husband Ronald Reese since their divorce in 1996. In 1998 she began cohabiting with William Stein and his two children. Ronald filed a motion in 2008 to terminate his obligation to pay alimony citing the defendant’s cohabitation. The trial judge determined that defendant’s 10-year cohabitation afforded her significant benefit such as that alimony was no longer warranted. Defendant cross-appealed the ruling, claiming that her monthly contribution to a joint account she held with Stein, in an amount equal to what she received as support from Plaintiff, coupled with proof of annual expenses exceeding the provided support proved she paid her way without Stein’s economic assistance. She also argued that the luxuries and gifts that accompanied her new lifestyle with William should not be considered an economic benefit to terminate her alimony.</p>
<p>The Court however upheld its ruling, rejecting her claim that her enhanced lifestyle should not be a part of the alimony equation. The panel stated to the contrary, that economic benefits, such as when the cohabitant pays for housing costs, as well as more subtle economic benefits, may legitimately be taken into consideration.   </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/improved-lifestyle-could-cost-you-in-alimony/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prevent Headaches with our Free Physician’s Financial Checklist</title>
		<link>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/physicians-financial-checklist/</link>
		<comments>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/physicians-financial-checklist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 14:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEDICAL PRACTICES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free checklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Practices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uandacpas.com/?p=1567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Urbach and Avraham is proud to offer a free comprehensive physician’s financial checklist to help you with maintaining your medical or dental practice.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maintaining a medical practice is becoming increasingly challenging from a financial standpoint. There are so many details to keep track of, and they are constantly evolving. Urbach and Avraham is proud to offer a free comprehensive physician’s financial checklist to help with this task. Our checklist, which is geared to the sole-practitioner as well as to larger medical practices, will help you:</p>
<ul>
<li>Reduce your taxes</li>
<li>Secure your assets</li>
<li>Take advantage of various tax credit opportunities</li>
<li>Prepare your budget</li>
<li>Address compliance issues including DOL and sales tax issues</li>
<li>Grow and transition your medical practice</li>
</ul>
<p>To view our physician’s checklist, click here:   <a title="Physician's financial checklist" href="http://uandacpas.com/healthcare-practices/physician-checklist/" target="_blank">Physician&#8217;s Financial Checklist</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uandacpas.com/blog/2013/05/physicians-financial-checklist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
